Our ICAI
As we are CAs, we consider our Institute as the epitome of professionalism, our alma mater. We expect to derive strength and nourishment from such an august body.
It has to lead us by example, showing high calibre of professionalism in whatever it stands for, in whatever it discharges as part of its purpose of existence as a national body of professionals and in whatever it projects to the outside world as part of its commitment for high standards of the profession.
ICAI Motto
My academics provided me with fair knowledge of Sanskrit, which is the language of the Motto, my spiritual inclination took me to some reading of vedic texts, such as Kathopanishad, which is the source of the Motto and my musical training made me appreciate the sublime tunes of our national melodies, Vandemataram and Janaganamana, which the Motto purports to align with.
With this background, I have a feeling of being hugely disappointed.
The reasons are too many – it, the Motto, speaks volumes of cluelessness and the total apathy on the part of those responsible for the elaboration of the Motto (which could be simply left at the opening words – ‘ya esha suptheshu jagarthi’-), their apathy towards certain values on which our profession is supposed to stand – the values of relevance, objectivity, sensibility, clarity, profundity with simplicity and purity with strength, and again, apathy on the part of those, who first gathered those words and those who later tinged them with some music and those, further, carry the same with blissful ignorance as part of their commitment as office bearers of the Institute.
As we are CAs, we have to be aware of the following about the Motto of our Institute:
a) the opening words - ‘ya esha suptheshu jagarthi’- is the Motto. The rest is superfluous for a body like our Institute
b) The translation, which is an esoteric commentary on the upanishadic verse ending with an epigram from Eckhart, a German mystic, is redundant both in context and content
c) The song is unsavoury, in all aspects, such as, utterance of words, jarring echo-like repetition in each phrase, tonal content, clarity in pronunciation and its chanting (in another version, thunderous) tune.
As I am a CA, I have to substantiate the above observations, which I will surely do in my subsequent posts.
What next?
Dear CA friends,
This is only a beginning of how I perceive the way in which the matters of our Institute are attended to and are being managed by those who are made responsible for the same by all of us by electing them to their respective capacities.
What other topics are to follow, which come to my mind at this juncture, can be summed up as follows:
CA course and examination - training at the academic and practical levels - regulating ‘discipline’ among the members with total absence of supporting their cause in several matters affecting them - lack of standards in structuring and conducting professional deliberations in workshops, seminars and conferences - preponderance of programmes for practicing CAs, always, leaving one wondering what could be the purpose of CAs in service continuing as members of the Institute? - do we have representatives from CAs in service and also women CAs, in the governing committees or councils at different levels, commensurate with their strength in the fraternity and if not, why?
These and other matters you can expect in my posts to follow.
A request
And meanwhile, why not join me, with your valuable inputs or, even just comments, a bit critical I don’t mind, or that is what I am looking for!